California Confiscation Tax Appears to be Headed for Defeat

The California Confiscation tax, or wealth tax, appears to be headed for defeat. While final results are pending because of mail-in ballots, the current approval gap suggests the tax likely won’t pass.

Proposition 40 was created to punish affluence in California. It would assess a 5% levy on anyone with a net worth over $1 billion. The tax was designed to include unrealized gains on any assets, including private securities.

The tax was concocted by SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West (SEIU-UHW), ostensibly to raise funding for healthcare in a state that is known to lose billions in public funds to fraud — including from state healthcare programs

Because California is home to the world’s most robust innovation ecosystem, the punitive tax would have penalized successful entrepreneurs who may have been wealthy on paper but cash-poor. The tax could have compelled individuals to sell holdings in a company they founded, potentially imperiling control of the firm. Many investors and creators lobbied against it. Even Governor Gavin Newsom opposed the tax, arguing that in the long run it would harm California.

Proponents claimed the tax would raise an additional $100 billion in revenue, but some economists challenged that premise, with a recent report saying it would actually cost California billions in tax revenue as affluent residents fled to more welcoming jurisdictions.

While some Democrats opposed the tax, extreme-left politicians like Senator Bernie Sanders and Congressman Rho Khanna vocally supported it. The California Democrat Party formally endorsed the proposition.

As of today, 55.6% of voters had voted against the proposal with 60% of the votes tallied.

A countermeasure was also on the ballot: Proposition 42 created a rule that would prohibit new state taxes on personal property in general. With 59% of the votes counted, 54.3% of the electorate supported the measure.

 

 



Sponsored Links by DQ Promote

 

 

Disclosure Quest

Reg A - Form 1-A Filings Beta

Beta. Initial Form 1-A only. Target raise is the stated Amount to be Raised, totaled. Compared with the same dates one year earlier.

YTD: Jan 1, 2026 - Nov 4, 2026 vs Jan 1, 2025 - Nov 4, 2025

Share this graph
Number of Filings134Prior 129 +3.9%
Target Raise, Total$3.45BPrior $3.59B -3.8%
This YTDYear priorChange
Filings 134 129 +3.9%
Target raise $3.45B $3.59B -3.8%

Sponsored by the Crowded Media Group the leading digital news service covering the global Fintech Industry, including digital assets, crowdfunding, tokenization, and other innovations in capital markets. email us @CrowdfundInside

Source: DisclosureQuest. Initial Form 1-A only.

Created by Crowded Media Group

This display counts initial Form 1-A filings only. It does not represent subsequent filings, including Form 1-A/A amendments or Form 1-A POS post-qualification updates filed by the issuer. Amounts are the stated Amount to be Raised on the initial filing, not capital raised and not amounts revised in later filings.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
 
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Send this to a friend