LendingClub Responds to FTC Complaint: “We do not agree and are very disappointed that it was not possible to resolve this matter constructively with the agency’s current leadership”

LendingClub (NYSE:LC), the largest marketplace lending platform in the US, has posted a response to a US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) complaint that was launched in 2016.

In brief, LendingClub had this to say:

“We do not agree and are very disappointed that it was not possible to resolve this matter constructively with the agency’s current leadership.”

Agree to Disagree

The FTC brought the action against LendingClub alleging that certain practices do not, or in the past did not, comply with the requirements of the FTC and Gramm-Leach-Bliley Acts – also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999.

LendingClub said it believes that the allegations in the FTC’s complaint are legally and factually unwarranted. LendingClu stated that it is disappointed that it was not possible to resolve this matter constructively with the agency’s current leadership and intends to oppose the claims and work towards an early resolution of the matter in Federal Court.

In a blog post, LendingClub itemized each allegation in question.

Claim 1: Origination Fee Disclosures: LendingClub said all fees are fully and prominently disclosed.

Claim 2: Past Communications About Loans Being Fully Backed: This references a temporary issue where emails were sent in error in 2015 for just 88 days before LendingClub discovered and proactively corrected the error.

Claim 3: Unauthorized ACH Withdrawals: False, says LendingClub, “this simply is not true. We maintain safeguards to prevent erroneous ACH withdrawals.”

Claim 4: Consumer Privacy Notice. This complaint refers to a historical practice, which the company updated on its own initiative as LendingClub requires all users to acknowledge the privacy notice.

LendingClub said they look forward to resolving this FTC claim quickly, adding;

“We don’t believe that the FTC’s allegations can be reconciled with our longstanding record of consumer satisfaction and we hope to resolve this litigation quickly. As one of the original Fintech innovators, we understand and appreciate the importance of regulatory oversight as we use technology to improve consumers’ financial lives. A recent report to Congress by the Government Accountability Office outlined the regulatory challenges, but did note “the number of consumer complaints against Fintech activities appears modest compared to traditional providers.” 

Is the FTC nitpicking? Perhaps. But most likely, this may end up as a protracted legal battle.



Sponsored Links by DQ Promote

 

 

Disclosure Quest

Reg A - Form 1-A Filings Beta

Beta. Initial Form 1-A only. Target raise is the stated Amount to be Raised, totaled. Compared with the same dates one year earlier.

YTD: Jan 1, 2026 - Nov 7, 2026 vs Jan 1, 2025 - Nov 7, 2025

Share this graph
Number of Filings134Prior 129 +3.9%
Target Raise, Total$3.45BPrior $3.59B -3.8%
This YTDYear priorChange
Filings 134 129 +3.9%
Target raise $3.45B $3.59B -3.8%

Sponsored by the Crowded Media Group the leading digital news service covering the global Fintech Industry, including digital assets, crowdfunding, tokenization, and other innovations in capital markets. email us @CrowdfundInside

Source: DisclosureQuest. Initial Form 1-A only.

Created by Crowded Media Group

This display counts initial Form 1-A filings only. It does not represent subsequent filings, including Form 1-A/A amendments or Form 1-A POS post-qualification updates filed by the issuer. Amounts are the stated Amount to be Raised on the initial filing, not capital raised and not amounts revised in later filings.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
 
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Send this to a friend