LexisNexis Risk Solutions Releases Study Evaluating How FIs Detect and Mitigate Authorized Transfer Scams

LexisNexis Risk Solutions released a study evaluating how financial institutions (FIs) detect and mitigate authorized transfer scams, where fraudsters manipulate or deceive account holders to transfer funds to them.

The study, Defend Against Authorized Transfer Scams, finds “that fraud risk and mitigation strategy leaders at US financial services institutions understand the importance of both detecting and mitigating scams effectively.”

However, they exhibit lower confidence “in their organizations’ capabilities and solutions for these efforts.”

While 81% of FIs prioritize mitigating more scams to “prevent customer financial loss, only 50% feel confident in their ability to do so.”

Fraudsters are highly skilled at “coaching targets to complete authorized transfer scams. They manipulate or deceive targets into transferring funds to them through various means, such as the false sale of goods, services or investments.”

They also use fraudulent payment instructions and impersonation schemes, “including posing as romantic interests, fake businesses, charities, family or friends.”

Soudamini Modak, director of fraud and identity at LexisNexis Risk Solutions said:

“Scams, fraud and financial vulnerability are on the increase. Meanwhile, consumers increasingly expect safer and more secure interactions and transactions. FIs must analyze digital and behavioral signals to implement better strategies for mitigating scams across multiple channels. It’s important FIs detect scams and other fraudulent behavior without frustrating consumers by slowing legitimate transactions and risking customers abandoning their transactions.”

Key Findings from the Study:

  • Consumers hesitate to believe they are the target of a scam. Sixty-nine percent (69%) reported that convincing customers that they are the target of a scam is difficult. Many organizations (72%) are trying to strike a balance between confidently proving to a target that they are being scammed and not divulging too much information.
  • Alerting customers in a timely manner once some scams are detected poses a challenge. Twenty-eight percent (28%) of FIs flag scams involving illegitimate orders for goods, services or investments to customers within 24 hours. However, only four percent of FIs can alert customers to scams involving the impersonation of financial services employees in the same time period.
  • Current capabilities and solutions are not enough to mitigate scams. Two in three (64%) of respondents reported challenges with their current solutions’ ability to mitigate authorized transfer scams. This generation of scams and scammers requires additional systems for detection and the adoption of advanced technologies that use data-based insights to assess payor and payee risk, determine if outreach is necessary and attempt to mitigate a scam before it concludes.
  • Detecting target coaching, malicious transfers and mitigating scams requires a comprehensive strategy. FIs are taking a multilayered approach to scam detection and mitigation and aligning upgraded capabilities with their overall goals for scam detection strategy. Sixty percent (60%) of FIs that aim to enable more confident outreach to customers understand that it is an essential part of effective scam mitigation. Expanding automation and implementing solutions to detect risky behaviors gives FIs the confidence to identify a consumer as the target in a scam.

Methodology

LexisNexis Risk Solutions commissioned Forrester Consulting to “conduct an online survey of 413 financial services directors and decision-makers at organizations in the US to evaluate fraud risk and mitigation strategies.”

Survey participants included decision-makers “in IT, operations, fraud prevention, customer service, digital banking and product management.”

Questions provided to the participants focused “on the current state and benefits of fraud mitigation strategies, as well as the current state and challenges of fraud risk. The study began and was completed in September 2023.”



Sponsored Links by DQ Promote

 

 

Disclosure Quest

Reg A - Form 1-A Filings Beta

Beta. Initial Form 1-A only. Target raise is the stated Amount to be Raised, totaled. Compared with the same dates one year earlier.

YTD: Jan 1, 2026 - Oct 22, 2026 vs Jan 1, 2025 - Oct 22, 2025

Share this graph
Number of Filings130Prior 125 +4.0%
Target Raise, Total$3.37BPrior $3.54B -4.7%
This YTDYear priorChange
Filings 130 125 +4.0%
Target raise $3.37B $3.54B -4.7%

Sponsored by the Crowded Media Group the leading digital news service covering the global Fintech Industry, including digital assets, crowdfunding, tokenization, and other innovations in capital markets. email us @CrowdfundInside

Source: DisclosureQuest. Initial Form 1-A only.

Created by Crowded Media Group

This display counts initial Form 1-A filings only. It does not represent subsequent filings, including Form 1-A/A amendments or Form 1-A POS post-qualification updates filed by the issuer. Amounts are the stated Amount to be Raised on the initial filing, not capital raised and not amounts revised in later filings.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
 
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Send this to a friend