AI and “Humanity” Focused Worldcoin Project Developers Announce Updates and Initiatives in San Francisco

Worldcoin recently shared a key project update in San Francisco.

As explained in a blog post, the Worldcoin initiative has reportedly been created (in 2019) in order to accelerate “humanity” in the age of AI.

According to its developers, the project has now grown and evolved “significantly” during the past five years. And now, Worldcoin developers claim that it’s time for the next phase in that ongoing development.

During the upcoming live event session “A new world” taking place in San Francisco on October 17, project co-inventors Alex Blania, CEO of Tools for Humanity, and Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, will reportedly be joined by various key members of the Worldcoin Foundation and TFH to discuss “meaningful updates” to the global intiative.

These key updates, which reportedly include improved digital technologies as well as ways to bring more individuals into the Worldcoin network, will aim to enable Worldcoin to scale from its current ~7 million verified humans to 700 million and “beyond,” while also offering important tools that should assist everyone with sharing in the “benefits” of the AI-powered Intelligence Age.

The “new world” event is not intended to “generate hype.”

Instead, this is an opportunity to clearly explain the next steps that Worldcoin, along with its contributors, are taking to “achieve its mission.” The team said they hope you’ll join us as they work to successfully bring “proof of human” online in a secure and anonymous manner.

While these ideas seem innovative and perhaps even unique, the Worldcoin initiative has been heavily scrutinized by regulatory authorities all over the world. In fact, the Worldcoin project team has also been forced to scale back many of its activities due to growing concerns about issues related to privacy and other potentially serious problems.

Although the Worldcoin project developers claim to offer anonymized services, it is not entirely clear whether this is actually true. The project has also been criticized for making statements which may not be consistent with its mission statement (such as maintaining privacy while also offering digital services people would actually need or find useful).



Sponsored Links by DQ Promote

 

 

 
Send this to a friend