Mortgage Servicing Apps Provide Uneven UX, Report Claims

Mobile apps have transformed the customer experience in various industries with their streamlined, easy-to-navigate interfaces and convenient access. The mortgage servicing industry has been one of the few exceptions to that rule, until recently relying on their websites and offline communications as the primary means of engaging with customers. According to the J.D. Power U.S. Mortgage Servicer Digital Experience Study, that slower industry-wide adoption of mobile apps is resulting in a “decidedly uneven digital user experience across different mortgage servicers.”

While some mortgage servicing apps are delivering on best practices, others are lagging “behind those of other lenders and apps from other industries.”

Bruce Gehrke, senior director of wealth and lending intelligence at J.D. Power:

“Mobile is the future of lending. There is no more effective way of being present at the exact moment when customer decisions are being made, and mortgage servicers who are getting their app formulas right are starting to recognize that having a great app is core to driving customer engagement and brand loyalty. Mortgage servicers have invested heavily in modernizing tech stacks and improving operational efficiencies to deliver incremental value behind the scenes. However, that same level of investment has not been applied consistently to mobile apps across the industry. Today’s borrowers expect a best-in-class mobile experience, and leading servicers recognize this—turning to mobile as a key differentiator for delivering a standout user experience.”

Following are some findings of the study:

  • Mortgage servicing apps lag websites and other industry apps: The average overall satisfaction score for mortgage servicer mobile apps is 704 (on a 1,000-point scale), which is 22 points lower than mortgage servicer websites; 38 points lower than wealth apps; and 35 points lower than retirement provider apps.
  • Most mortgage servicing apps fail to deliver on basics: Just 44% of mortgage servicing apps deliver basic foundational functionality by ensuring the app is not frequently down or unavailable and conveying a clean, modern look and feel. When it comes to delivering truly valuable digital experiences, however, those numbers fall sharply. For example, just 12% of mortgage servicer apps deliver valuable user experiences that include the ability to easily set up alerts; direct extra payments toward principal balance; and identify an expected shortage/overage in escrow accounts.
  • Uneven digital experience: The overall satisfaction score for the top-performing brand in the study, Bank of America, is 784, which is 71 points higher than the industry average satisfaction score across both apps and websites (713). On average, national bank brands are delivering more consistent, satisfying digital mortgage servicing experiences.

Jon Sundberg, senior director of digital solutions at J.D. Power

“The overall framework of an app experience is built on the core pillars of intuitive navigation, fast performance, and visual appeal. Many mortgage servicer apps are lagging top performers in other industries when it comes to these essentials. With just 44% of apps delivering a foundational user experience, there is a lot of room for improvement in this space.”

Bank of America ranks highest in “overall satisfaction for mortgage servicer digital experience with a score of 784.”

Chase (762) ranks second and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (754) ranks third.

The J.D. Power Mortgage Servicer Digital Experience Study “evaluates digital experiences of customers from the largest mortgage servicers in the United States.”

It examines the functional aspects of “desktop websites and mobile apps based on four factors (in order of importance): design; system performance; information; and tools/capabilities.”

The 2025 study is based on “5,223 evaluations provided by mortgage customers who visited their mortgage servicer’s website or mobile app in the past nine months.” It was fielded “in Sept-Oct 2025.”



Sponsored Links by DQ Promote

 

 

Disclosure Quest

Reg A - Form 1-A Filings Beta

Beta. Initial Form 1-A only. Target raise is the stated Amount to be Raised, totaled. Compared with the same dates one year earlier.

YTD: Jan 1, 2026 - Oct 21, 2026 vs Jan 1, 2025 - Oct 21, 2025

Share this graph
Number of Filings130Prior 125 +4.0%
Target Raise, Total$3.37BPrior $3.54B -4.7%
This YTDYear priorChange
Filings 130 125 +4.0%
Target raise $3.37B $3.54B -4.7%

Sponsored by the Crowded Media Group the leading digital news service covering the global Fintech Industry, including digital assets, crowdfunding, tokenization, and other innovations in capital markets. email us @CrowdfundInside

Source: DisclosureQuest. Initial Form 1-A only.

Created by Crowded Media Group

This display counts initial Form 1-A filings only. It does not represent subsequent filings, including Form 1-A/A amendments or Form 1-A POS post-qualification updates filed by the issuer. Amounts are the stated Amount to be Raised on the initial filing, not capital raised and not amounts revised in later filings.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
 
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Send this to a friend