UK’s Landbay, a Buy-to-Let Mortgage Lender, Explains that Automatic Valuation Models and Desktop Valuations Don’t Work Well for Specialized Lenders

UK-based Landbay, a buy-to-let mortgage lender that provides various borrowing opportunities, says that automatic valuation models (AVM) and desktop valuations used by major buy-to-let lenders during COVID-19 are not possible for more specialized lenders.

A desktop valuation usually refers to valuations that are undertaken with limited or indirectly sourced information. These types of valuations usually do not perform a complete physical or in-person inspection of a property. In qualifying circumstances, experts claim they’re able to offer a reasonable opinion or assessment of value from their desks (without actually visiting the property being assessed).

AVMs require minimal or no human input. They’re an automated version of a desktop valuation that examines property or housing sale data and offers an evaluation after reviewing this information.

Physical or on-site property valuations have, for the most part, been put on hold due to the Coronavirus crisis which has led to the enforcement of lockdowns or other types of restrictions to prevent the further spread of the virus. Desktop valuations and AVMs are increasingly being used now by major or mainstream buy-to-let lenders.

Landbay, a specialist buy-to-let mortgage lender that was once a peer to peer lender until it left the retail investment market in December 2019, claims that this method isn’t really an option for alternative lenders because of the type of funding model they use.

Landbay’s management noted that alternative lenders’ funding is usually drawn from wholesale channels like large banking institutions. These larger and more traditional banks typically want to perform physical valuations and they specifically mention this in the funding agreement, Landbay explained.

The company noted that lenders with their financial resources “intending to recoup the capital utilized to create their mortgage book via a securitization, or via ‘whole loan mortgage book’ sales, would not generally allow desktop valuations or AVMs.”

Landbay added:

“Currently, if you don’t have physical valuations on every single property, regardless of LTV and regardless of whether it is for a remortgage or a purchase, those mortgages will not be desirable, so they are not currently acceptable assets for securitization or onward sale.”

Landbay noted that AVMs and desktop valuations might work for standard properties that are similar and based in the same location. But Landbay also points out that AVMs might not work when the properties are not similar and can’t really be compared to each other.



Sponsored Links by DQ Promote

 

 

Disclosure Quest

Reg A - Form 1-A Filings Beta

Beta. Initial Form 1-A only. Target raise is the stated Amount to be Raised, totaled. Compared with the same dates one year earlier.

YTD: Jan 1, 2026 - Oct 22, 2026 vs Jan 1, 2025 - Oct 22, 2025

Share this graph
Number of Filings130Prior 125 +4.0%
Target Raise, Total$3.37BPrior $3.54B -4.7%
This YTDYear priorChange
Filings 130 125 +4.0%
Target raise $3.37B $3.54B -4.7%

Sponsored by the Crowded Media Group the leading digital news service covering the global Fintech Industry, including digital assets, crowdfunding, tokenization, and other innovations in capital markets. email us @CrowdfundInside

Source: DisclosureQuest. Initial Form 1-A only.

Created by Crowded Media Group

This display counts initial Form 1-A filings only. It does not represent subsequent filings, including Form 1-A/A amendments or Form 1-A POS post-qualification updates filed by the issuer. Amounts are the stated Amount to be Raised on the initial filing, not capital raised and not amounts revised in later filings.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
 
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Send this to a friend