Digital Asset Industry Professionals Comment on Recent Crypto Regulatory Requirements in Singapore

This week, it was widely reported that Singapore will soon require cryptocurrency exchanges to keep customer assets in a trust as part of efforts to ensure funds are safeguarded following the implosion of FTX in November. The city-state also plans to push ahead with a proposal to ban lending and staking for retail investors.

Crypto industry professionals have some observations on this development.

Michael Silberberg, Head of Investor Relations at AltTab Capital, commented,

“While the intention behind separating customers from business assets is in the right place, there must be a carefully thought-out definition of what is and is not a trust. Over the last cycle, we’ve seen the dissolution of both custodians and exchanges. There will be a certification process for “qualified custodians” in the regulation with definitions of cryptographic key management and operational structures. We see a trend worldwide of “regulated custodians,” many of which are small companies with an institutional ledger and a metamask in domiciles where regulation just means “filed as a company. More counterparties does not necessarily mean more security.”

Bradley Duke, co-CEO at ETC Group, commented,

“The approach to crypto regulation taken by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has no doubt been shaped by the high-profile failure of local hedge fund Three Arrows Capital. At ETC Group, we welcome sensible regulation in crypto that lays down a clear framework bringing stability and comfort to both service providers and investors alike. The new regulation goes far including a ban on lending and staking for retail investors – but the MAS has stated that they could review that position in future. The regulator in Hong Kong, its regional rival in financial services, will surely be examining this new regulation closely.”



Sponsored Links by DQ Promote

 

 

Disclosure Quest

Reg A - Form 1-A Filings Beta

Beta. Initial Form 1-A only. Target raise is the stated Amount to be Raised, totaled. Compared with the same dates one year earlier.

YTD: Jan 1, 2026 - Oct 23, 2026 vs Jan 1, 2025 - Oct 23, 2025

Share this graph
Number of Filings131Prior 125 +4.8%
Target Raise, Total$3.40BPrior $3.54B -3.9%
This YTDYear priorChange
Filings 131 125 +4.8%
Target raise $3.40B $3.54B -3.9%

Sponsored by the Crowded Media Group the leading digital news service covering the global Fintech Industry, including digital assets, crowdfunding, tokenization, and other innovations in capital markets. email us @CrowdfundInside

Source: DisclosureQuest. Initial Form 1-A only.

Created by Crowded Media Group

This display counts initial Form 1-A filings only. It does not represent subsequent filings, including Form 1-A/A amendments or Form 1-A POS post-qualification updates filed by the issuer. Amounts are the stated Amount to be Raised on the initial filing, not capital raised and not amounts revised in later filings.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
 
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Send this to a friend