Cryptocurrency skeptics, in particular, these days are closely watching the showdown now underway between sister crypto companies Bitfinex and Tether and the New York Attorney General’s Office, which has alleged fraud at the two firms.
As a bit of background, Tether makes a synthetic US dollar cryptocurrency called Tether and has done so since 2014.
Tether shares the same executive team as the crypto trading platform Bitfinex, and many Tethers have been introduced into crypto trading markets via that platform.
Until late February 2019, Tether always told the public that every Tether coin it issued was backed 1-to-1 by equivalent dollars held in reserve accounts. The company has never completed a credible audit, however.
Critics have accused the company of “printing money” that they then move out into markets to capture other crypto coins, pump them and reap the profits in a sell.
Tether has been identified by University of Texas finance professor John Griffin and others, as an instrument of market manipulation in crypto markets, especially Bitcoin’s:
“(W)e find that purchases with Tether are timed following market downturns and result in sizable increases in Bitcoin prices. Less than 1% of hours with such heavy Tether transactions are associated with 50% of the meteoric rise in Bitcoin and 64% of other top cryptocurrencies.”
Wikipedia’s current entry on Tether claims:
“From January 2017 to September 2018, the amount of tethers outstanding grew from about $10 million to about $2.8 billion. In early 2018 Tether accounted for about 10% of the trading volume of bitcoin, but during the summer of 2018 it accounted for up to 80% of bitcoin volume.“
Critics have long wondered why the apparently questionable business practices of Tether have been allowed to go on for so long.
Now “CryptoTwitter” pundit “Torkild Rieber” says New York Attorney General’s Office may have executed “a scripted strategy” to frighten Tether and Bitfinex into implicating themselves.
More background: in April of this year, the NYAG invoked powerful Martin Act securities laws ex parte compelling Bitfinex/Tether to produce comprehensive business records, to which Rieber refers:
Rieber goes on to state that execution of the Martin Act subpoena may have been preceded by a deliberately provoking seizure of $850 million USD of Bitfinex’s funds from on of its payments processors, Crypto Capital. That seizure took place in Panama last fall, but was never disclosed to the public by either Tether or Bitfinex.
In the fall of 2018, the NYAG and Tether engaged in some kind of negotiation regarding Tether’s business records. When Tether refused to provide these voluntarily, says Rieber, the NYAG had fodder to obtain the ex parte demand:
The NYAG then obtained more fodder by somehow monitoring company communications:
The AG then found it expedient to make its investigation public:
Bitfinex et al were now off-kilter, Rieber suggests, and the situation was tipped:
Perhaps predictably, by arguing against the scope of the Martin Act laws, Bitfinex lawyers walked into a trap: