Parallella’s Creator Reveals Why He Will Not Be Returning to Kickstarter For Other Projects

Back in September 2012, Massachusetts-based Adapteva launched a crowdfunding campaign on Kickstarter to raise funds for its invention, Parallella. The device is described as a “supercomputer for everyone” and its platform was built on the following principles:

  • Parallella 1Open Access: Absolutely no NDAs or special access needed! All architecture and SDK documents will be published on the web as soon as the Kickstarter project is funded.
  • Open Source: The Parallella platform will be based on free open source development tools and libraries. All board design files will be provided as open source once the Parallella boards are released.
  • Affordability: Hardware costs and SDK costs have always been a huge barrier to entry for developers looking to develop high performance applications. Our goal is to bring the Parallella high performance computer cost below $100, making it an affordable platform for all.

By the end of its run, the campaign raised $898,921 from 4,965 backers. Despite the success of the project, Adapteva’s founder Andreas Olofsson admits that he doesn’t have any plans to ever use Kickstarter again for the company’s products.

 

While revealing details about the company and why it turned to Kickstarter for funds, Olofsson wrote:

Andreas Olofsson“In September 2012, motivated by some of these success stories we decided to launch a new single board computer project called Parallella on Kickstarter. The campaign ended up raising $898,921 from 4,965 backers in less than a month. On the surface this looked like a huge success, but over the next two years we ended up spending more than $1.5 million to deliver on all of our Kickstarter commitments.

 

“In the end Adapteva would have likely gone out of business if it wasn’t for an infusion of capital from Ericsson and other investors. Based on Kickstarter shipping and funding patterns, I am guessing that there are other successful Kickstarter projects that have gone down the same path.”

Also discussing the campaign, the Andreas shared:

“Once you reach your Kickstarter funding goal, before you get started, ~10% of the raised money disappears off the top due to invalid backer credit card numbers, Kickstarter commission (5%) and Amazon payment fees. Considering that traditional hardware distribution channels can charge as much as 25%, this isn’t bad but it still hurts. If you raise $1M, we are still talking $100,000 out the window on day 1.

 

“If you are thinking about doing a Kickstarter project, you probably think of your time as free. Please don’t! Doing a Kickstarter project is not a good hobby, it is stressful. You should value your time at the market rate.

 

“The table below shows the projected development costs of three different hypothetical Kickstarter projects with competitive US engineering salaries (loaded). The break even number at the end of the table only accounts for engineering. Tooling, marketing, and other expenses would drive this higher.

 

“Based on the data, achievable Kickstarter targets should be: 1K units for professional must have ~$1000 products, 10K units for enthusiast nice to have ~$100 products, and 100K units for ~$25 consumer gadgets. Be efficient and price your product correctly.”

Parallella 2

Andreas noted that the data (shown below) reveals early manufacturing cost projections for Parallella based on conversations with US manufacturers. This left the company with three options:

  1. Parallella 3Move forward into production at $80 lost per board sold
  2. Move manufacturing to China
  3. Keep looking for partners and manufacturers in the US who were willing to work for less.

Olofsson continued:

“In the end we chose the third option. After many months of cost cutting and extraordinary compromises for all parties involved we were able to cut the COGS shown by over 50% while keeping manufacturing in the US.”

In regards to ever considering Kickstarter again, Andreas added:

“When someone asks me if I would ever do a Kickstarter project again, my answer is always ‘No way!’ In terms of technology democratization, the Parallella Kickstarter project was a huge success, but it was a financial disaster for Adapteva.

 

parallella“With true labor adjusted engineering costs, the majority of Kickstarter hardware projects are not viable businesses when considered in isolation. In aggregate, backers put up millions in capital but often end up with half-finished beta level products in return — if they get them at all.  Many project creators end up working for months or years under severe psychological stress to fulfill Kickstarter obligations.

 

“So if Kickstarter isn’t the answer, how can you build a hardware business these days? Well, how about going back to basics? 1.) build a product, 2.) sell it for profit, 3.) goto #1. It’s certainly slower, but it has worked for countless hardware companies in the past and it still works today given the right product.”

 


Have a crowdfunding offering you'd like to share? Submit an offering for consideration using our Submit a Tip form and we may share it on our site!

Sponsored Links by DQ Promote