Japan Regulators Deny They’re Considering Approving Bitcoin ETF

Regulators from the Japanese Financial Services Agency today told Cointelegraph Japan that, contrary to information provided by an anonymous source to Bloomberg, the agency is not contemplating approving Bitcoin ETFs in Japan right now.

According to an FSA source to Cointelegraph:

“We are not considering approval of ETF using cryptographic assets at this time.”

The source reportedly added, “I do not know anyone…(confused about the matter in the) FSA.”

Japan was once one of the busiest crypto-trading regions in the world, and the island nation likely absorbed some of the business relocating from China when that country began enacting a series of bans on the sector starting in early 2017.

Just before that, an estimated 95% of the world’s bitcoin trades were being conducted in yuan. That number has now gone down to around 5%, according to Morgan Stanley.

But a shocking $534 million dollar hack on the Japanese crypto exchange Coincheck in January 2018 badly shook Japanese crypto markets and likely sobered everyday investors there.

A Bitcoin ETF product could reduce risks associated with cryptocurrency custody. A Bitcoin ETF provider would, theoretically, store backing volumes of real bitcoin in “vaults” with no direct contact with the Internet, making those reserves much harder to hack.

The company would sell “shares” or certificates representing bitcoins, but no actual bitcoins would have to change hands for trading.

That the FSA has now denied its interest in ETFs, for the time being, suggests the news reported at Bloomberg may have been fed by someone with an interest in reviving interest in crypto trading in Japan.

Critics of Bitcoin ETFs like Tone Vays have argued that ETFs should not be regarded as particularly beneficial for the utopian objectives of Bitcoin, which involve taking custody of and securely holding one’s own bitcoins.

ETFs are just another way to enrich middlemen taking fees, Vays has implied.

ETFs are considered part of the mainstreaming of crypto, something that could allow average people not savvy about securely holding Bitcoin to trade the coin’s volatility.

Numerous companies in the US, including Gemini, VanEck, Proshares, and Direxion have applied to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to have Bitcoin ETF products approved, but all the applications have been either postponed or denied.

Many have written the SEC to express concerns about volatility, manipulation and other errant conduct in underlying bitcoin and other crypto spot markets.

The SEC is also undoubtedly aware that numerous American justice agencies are also now conducting comprehensive and joint investigations into fraudulent practices in cryptocurrency markets across the country.

Unlike the US, Japan has reportedly refused to approve Bitcoin futures, making the rumour of “considering a Bitcoin ETF” even more important to parties looking for a lift to crypto markets which have been in persistent decline (currently -80%) since last year’s highs.



Sponsored Links by DQ Promote

 

 

Disclosure Quest

Reg A - Form 1-A Filings Beta

Beta. Initial Form 1-A only. Target raise is the stated Amount to be Raised, totaled. Compared with the same dates one year earlier.

YTD: Jan 1, 2026 - Oct 25, 2026 vs Jan 1, 2025 - Oct 25, 2025

Share this graph
Number of Filings131Prior 126 +4.0%
Target Raise, Total$3.40BPrior $3.54B -3.9%
This YTDYear priorChange
Filings 131 126 +4.0%
Target raise $3.40B $3.54B -3.9%

Sponsored by the Crowded Media Group the leading digital news service covering the global Fintech Industry, including digital assets, crowdfunding, tokenization, and other innovations in capital markets. email us @CrowdfundInside

Source: DisclosureQuest. Initial Form 1-A only.

Created by Crowded Media Group

This display counts initial Form 1-A filings only. It does not represent subsequent filings, including Form 1-A/A amendments or Form 1-A POS post-qualification updates filed by the issuer. Amounts are the stated Amount to be Raised on the initial filing, not capital raised and not amounts revised in later filings.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
 
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Send this to a friend