Indian Supreme Court Orders Government to Regulate Crypto Sector Within Four Weeks

The Supreme Court of India yesterday ordered the Indian state to establish rules to govern the cryptocurrencies and sector there within four weeks, Inc42 reports.

Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman and Vineet Saran also declined to hear from any more petitioners regarding an ongoing legal fight against the Indian Central Bank order that all banks stop servicing the crypto sector, and advised the government that if it did not make a determination soon, the courts would proceed to do so.

Founder and CEO of cryptocurrency startup WazirX, Nischal Shetty, reportedly expressed relief about the order. He said it is the first time a deadline has been imposed that could compel the government to finalize legislation and clearly govern the so far murkily-regulated sector.

According to Quartz, the government of PM Narendra Modi established a panel to study how to regulate the crypto sector in November 2017.

The panel promised to provide findings by July 2018, but failed, and no proposed legislation has yet been tabled.

In November 2018, Indian courts produced an affidavit ordering the government of India to produce a timeline stating when legislation could be expected, and the government responded by promising to table proposed laws by March 2019.

The matter is pressing for a number of individuals who started crypto businesses in India despite what they describe as a confusing lack of legal clarity.

India has been the site of numerous cryptocurrency scams (almost $3 billion USD may have been removed from Indian pockets by Bitconnect scammers).

Arguably more “legitimate” entrepreneurs, however, also had their operations stymied last April when the Central Bank of India (RBI), while granting a three-month grace period, ordered all banks in the country to stop servicing cryptocurrency firms, including trading platforms and ATM businesses.

“Crypto-businesses” for the most part offer trading or money transmission services exclusively, meaning if they cannot receive client monies, they cannot collect fees and therefore cannot operate.

As they watched their revenue channels suddenly dry up, numerous crypto personages and firms, including Amit Lakhanpal –now accused of orchestrating a $107 million dollar (Rs 500-crore) cryptocurrency fraud– petitioned the courts to strike down the RBI’s order.

Not everyone petitioning the courts around crypto regulations has been in favour of the phenomenon.

According to Inc42, lawyers and, “petitioners (Dwaipayan) Bhowmick and (Vijay Pal Dalmia) have been advocating for a ban on cryptocurrency citing the lack of policies.”



Sponsored Links by DQ Promote

 

 

Disclosure Quest

Reg A - Form 1-A Filings Beta

Beta. Initial Form 1-A only. Target raise is the stated Amount to be Raised, totaled. Compared with the same dates one year earlier.

YTD: Jan 1, 2026 - Nov 4, 2026 vs Jan 1, 2025 - Nov 4, 2025

Share this graph
Number of Filings134Prior 129 +3.9%
Target Raise, Total$3.45BPrior $3.59B -3.8%
This YTDYear priorChange
Filings 134 129 +3.9%
Target raise $3.45B $3.59B -3.8%

Sponsored by the Crowded Media Group the leading digital news service covering the global Fintech Industry, including digital assets, crowdfunding, tokenization, and other innovations in capital markets. email us @CrowdfundInside

Source: DisclosureQuest. Initial Form 1-A only.

Created by Crowded Media Group

This display counts initial Form 1-A filings only. It does not represent subsequent filings, including Form 1-A/A amendments or Form 1-A POS post-qualification updates filed by the issuer. Amounts are the stated Amount to be Raised on the initial filing, not capital raised and not amounts revised in later filings.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
 
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Send this to a friend