Over 66% of Consumers Want their Financial Institution to Become More Sustainable: Report

The “Is the grass greener on the sustainable side?” report surveyed more than 6,000 consumers on their attitudes “to green finance globally.”

As noted in an update from Mambu, the report reveals that, while the majority are in favor of greener financial options, consumers “have little trust in the industry’s sustainability credentials.”

Nearly half (48%) stated that access “to green financial services has become more important to them in the last five years, yet more than two thirds (67%) of global consumers believe that their current financial institution is guilty of greenwashing.”

However, just two in five (42%) consumers “think that their current bank or financial institution clearly communicates its sustainability commitments, and only 37% know what climate pledges they have publicly announced or committed to.”

There’s also confusion “around exactly what ‘green finance’ is, as over a third (35%) of consumers don’t fully understand the difference between green finance (a product that has been designed to protect the environment or to manage the impacts of finance and investments on the environment) and ethical finance (finance which takes into account not only financial returns but also environmental, social and governance factors) indicating a need for greater education and communication within the industry.”

Adoption of green finance “is far from mainstream.”

Just over 1 in 4 (26%) consumers “have knowingly made use of a sustainable banking product or service.”

But, of those that have, “the vast majority (84%) were more satisfied with these services than traditional banking products.”

The survey shows that consumers “want banks to be more transparent and have greater power in holding them to account.”

Nearly three fifths (58%) would like “more control over how and where their money is invested – to align with their personal values.”

Meanwhile, over half (55%) would like “a say on the types of green financial products and services their financial institution develops in future.”

Anna Krotova, Director of Sustainability at Mambu, said:

“Our research shows that consumers are increasingly looking for ways to make greener financial decisions, but remain sceptical about how strongly banks are committed to the sustainability agenda. They want to play a more active role in making green finance the future of finance, and there’s a huge opportunity for forward-thinking players to get ahead in this transition. Mambu empowers financial institutions to do just that and build sustainable financial products quickly and cost-effectively to meet consumer demands.”

Specifically, 42% of consumers would “welcome incentives and loyalty programmes that reward them for making greener financial decisions.”

The same percentage would like “to hear more about sustainability commitments during the onboarding process for financial products and services.”

Mambu’s research shows that consumers “are increasingly looking for ways to make greener financial decisions, but remain skeptical about how strongly banks are committed to the sustainability agenda.”

Yet, consumers are less interested “in the granular details of sustainability targets.”

Little over a quarter (26%) would like “to receive monthly sustainability reports from their banks and just 20% are interested in them benchmarking or scoring themselves using a sustainability index or rating system.”

When it comes to the most in-demand green financial products, global consumers “cite sustainable credit and debit cards (45%); green savings accounts and bonds (42%); green loans (31%) and green mortgages (31%) among the offerings they’d most like to see.”

The findings also “demonstrate the green finance opportunity for banks, as nearly half (49%) of consumers say they would consider switching to a provider with a stronger commitment to sustainability, yet less than a third (32%) are willing to pay a premium in order to do so.”



Sponsored Links by DQ Promote

 

 

Disclosure Quest

Reg A - Form 1-A Filings Beta

Beta. Initial Form 1-A only. Target raise is the stated Amount to be Raised, totaled. Compared with the same dates one year earlier.

YTD: Jan 1, 2026 - Oct 23, 2026 vs Jan 1, 2025 - Oct 23, 2025

Share this graph
Number of Filings131Prior 125 +4.8%
Target Raise, Total$3.40BPrior $3.54B -3.9%
This YTDYear priorChange
Filings 131 125 +4.8%
Target raise $3.40B $3.54B -3.9%

Sponsored by the Crowded Media Group the leading digital news service covering the global Fintech Industry, including digital assets, crowdfunding, tokenization, and other innovations in capital markets. email us @CrowdfundInside

Source: DisclosureQuest. Initial Form 1-A only.

Created by Crowded Media Group

This display counts initial Form 1-A filings only. It does not represent subsequent filings, including Form 1-A/A amendments or Form 1-A POS post-qualification updates filed by the issuer. Amounts are the stated Amount to be Raised on the initial filing, not capital raised and not amounts revised in later filings.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
 
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Send this to a friend